The European Super League has been revived after the European Union's top court ruled UEFA and FIFA defied competition law by blocking the breakaway project.
Thursday's ruling was praised by Real Madrid, which, along with Barcelona, is leading the fight to form a rival competition to the Champions League.
"It has been fully recognised that the clubs have the right to propose and promote European competitions that modernise our sport and attract fans from all over the world," Madrid president Florentino Perez said.
READ MORE: 'Massive overs': Aussie great questions Cummins payday
READ MORE: 'Bittersweet day': Melbourne Cup winners in shock split
READ MORE: Pakistan dealt major blow after first Test hammering
"Today, a Europe of freedoms has triumphed, and also football and its fans have triumphed."
However, it was a backlash by fans especially in England and Germany against the original project in April 2021 that helped to stop Super League within 48 hours, and no new clubs immediately came forward on Thursday to support Perez's vision.
The case was heard last year at the European Court of Justice after Super League failed at launch more than two years ago. UEFA President Aleksander Ceferin called the club leaders then "snakes" and "liars".
The company formed by 12 rebel clubs — now led by only Real Madrid and Barcelona after Juventus withdrew this year — started legal action and the court was asked to rule on points of EU law by a Madrid tribunal.
"We have won the right to compete. The UEFA monopoly is over. Football is free," said Bernd Reichart, the CEO of A22 Sports Management that promotes Super League.
"Clubs are now free from the threat of sanctions and free to determine their own futures."
Madrid-based A22 immediately announced new proposed competitions for men and women, saying young fans are "turning away" from football.
In a presentation streamed on YouTube, Reichart said there would be no permanent members of the new competition and they would remain committed to their domestic leagues. The league and knockout competition would also be played midweek so as not to impact domestic leagues.
The clubs accused UEFA of breaching European law by allegedly abusing its market dominance of football competitions.
"The FIFA and UEFA rules making any new interclub football project subject to their prior approval, such as the Super League, and prohibiting clubs and players from playing in those competitions, are unlawful," the court said.
"There is no framework for the FIFA and UEFA rules ensuring that they are transparent, objective, non-discriminatory and proportionate."
The court acknowledged FIFA and UEFA were abusing a dominant position and their rules on approval, control and sanctions "must be held to be unjustified restrictions on the freedom to provide services."
"Allow me to tell the European clubs that we are at the beginning of a new time in which we can work freely through constructive dialogue, without threats, without acting against anything or anyone and with the aim of innovating and modernising football to continue, fueling the passion of the fans," Perez said.
While clearing the way for Super League, the court also said it "does not mean that a competition such as the Super League project must necessarily be approved".
UEFA said it addressed last year "a historical shortfall within UEFA's pre-authorisation framework" and pledged to continue defending the central role of governing bodies in the European sports model.
"UEFA is confident in the robustness of its new rules, and specifically that they comply with all relevant European laws and regulations," it said.
Two years after the original idea collapsed, Super League promoters presented in February a new proposal for a multi-division competition involving up to 80 European football teams and operating outside of UEFA's authority. The latest plans announced on Thursday would involve 64 men's teams and 32 women's clubs.
The European Club Association, which represents Europe's top football clubs, reiterated its staunch opposition to the Super League.
"In short, the world of football moved on from the Super League years ago and progressive reforms will continue," the group said.
"All the recognised stakeholders of European and world football — spanning confederations, federations, clubs, leagues, players and fans — stand more united than ever against the attempts by a few individuals pursing personal agendas to undermine the very foundations and basic principles of European football."
English clubs are still unlikely to join a revived plan. The Premier League's international appeal and financial power has grown in the past two years, and a UK government bill announced last month by King Charles proposed powers to block English teams from trying to join a breakaway league.
The Premier League Owners' Charter states clubs "will not engage in the creation of new competition formats outside of the Premier League's rules".
The Spanish league said on Thursday "that the Super League is a selfish and elitist model."
"Anything that is not fully open, with direct access only through the domestic leagues, season by season, is a closed format," it said.
The court also noted that rules giving FIFA and UEFA exclusive control over the commercial exploitation of the media rights related to their competitions are "such as to be harmful to European football clubs, all companies operating in media markets and, ultimately, consumers and television viewers, by preventing them from enjoying new and potentially innovative or interesting competitions".
Reichart of A22 said he will offer to fans "free viewing of all Super League matches" and sent a message to clubs that "revenues and solidarity spending will be guaranteed" in Super League.
The original announcement of Super League sparked vehement protests from fans, and Football Supporters Europe said on Thursday there was "no place in European football for a breakaway super league."
"Our clubs, our competitions, & our local communities need protection," it said in a post on X, formerly Twitter.
"Whatever comes next, the super league remains an ill-conceived project that endangers the future of European football."
https://twitter.com/FansEurope/status/1737851570996621568
The Court of Justice's ruling was the most anticipated sports decision since the so-called Bosman Ruling in 1995. That case upended football's transfer system, drove up pay for top players who became free agents when contracts expired, and ultimately accelerated a wealth and competitive divide between rich clubs and the rest.
When Super League was unveiled — a largely closed competition as an alternative to the UEFA-run Champions League — widespread condemnation hit the rebel clubs from England, Spain and Italy.
UEFA's defence was that it protected the special place of sports in European society by running competitions in a pyramid structure open to all, and funded the grassroots of the game. This season, the Champions League included Royal Antwerp, which won its first Belgian title for 66 years, and Union Berlin, which rose into the German top division only in 2019.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.